Search for: "Pena v. Grant"
Results 1 - 20
of 138
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2016, 4:35 pm
The SCT has agreed to hear the case of Pena Rodriguez v. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 2:50 pm
Pena v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 2:51 pm
In Pena v Serrano, 2017 WL 6542758 (W.D. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 8:11 am
Today, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 10:09 am
Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 7:46 pm
DOJ (D.D.C.) -- rejecting FBI’s claim that two files pertaining to Donald Trump are categorically exempt under Exemptions 7(D) and 7(E) solely because they are within an informant file.Lopez-Pena v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 12:14 pm
Lozano v. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 7:35 pm
Issue summary is from ScotusBlog, which also links to papers: Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 9:13 am
Matter of Cavallero v Pena 2011 NY Slip Op 03597 Decided on April 26, 2011 Appellate Division, Second Department The family court affirmed the supreme court decision to grant sole custody to mother and to deny father’s petition for sole custody and to relocate to a different county. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 12:55 pm
Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 5:40 am
Pena-Montes, 2009 U.S. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 1:12 pm
Pena, No. 15-3235, 2016 WL 8275092 (E.D. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 12:35 pm
State v. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 10:46 am
Evid. 606(b)’s admonition against using juror testimony to impeach a verdict.On appeal, the defendants argued that Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 5:12 am
Grant of suppression reversed. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 2:11 pm
" CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE, HABEAS CORPUS Pena v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 10:35 am
App. ___, 815 S.E.2d 415, 421 (2018) (internal quotations omitted) (PDR granted); see also Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 8:00 am
The Estate of Gianna Prather, a minor, et al. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:46 pm
That is the question considered by the the Court of Appeals in, People v Grant (_NY3d_ [10/20/11) at (see). [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:46 pm
Subdivision three has been held to require an actually existing weapon (People v Pena, 50 NY2d 400 [1980]). [read post]